A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 6, 2018, around D restaurant located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around 14:25 on May 14, 2018, the Defendant: (a) left the police box F (30 tax) of the police box belonging to the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Police Station E (Seoul) where the Defendant called out after receiving a report that the Defendant gets ped on the bus; and (b) laid the police box, and (c) laid down the fice tobacco butts on the floor.

Accordingly, the defendant is asked by F to speak about his personal information for the crackdown on the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, disregarding this, and dies in governance.

”, “ 개새끼들”, “ 개새끼들 아 내가 뭘 잘못했냐.

The governance of China has died when China was in China.

"............. the horse F made an assault on the left face of the F in one time by asking about the personal information of the horse F...

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with his legitimate execution of public duties by carrying out public duties related to the maintenance of public peace and order of the crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the date of the second public trial shall be the date);

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A damaged photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports (investigation into telephone conversations against a reporter and bus engineer);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: when the face of the police officer in uniformed by the defendant is taken, the nature of the crime is not good in light of the part and method of assault; when the defendant's public authority was damaged due to the crime of this case; the defendant's personal fraud was also damaged; the defendant's recognition of the crime of bodily injury in 2009 and the defendant's records favorable to the fact that there was no record of criminal punishment exceeding a fine: there was no record of criminal punishment exceeding a fine; the above circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, motive, background, means and consequence of the crime; and