logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.04.06 2015고단4940
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From May 7, 2012 to August 31, 2015, the Defendant is a person who is in charge of the review of retirement and bereaved family benefits under the victim public official pension law D in the victim public official pension service D in the 11th floor of the C building.

1. Payment of bereaved family benefits to E:

A. On August 27, 2015, the Defendant searched at the F Team Office of the F Team Office of the Public Official Pension Service, and entered false information, knowing that the public official E of G died without a bereaved family member on November 28, 201, and knowing that the Defendant died without a bereaved family member, the Defendant entered the said E’s personal information as his/her spouse.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged private electronic records for the purpose of making administrative affairs smooth.

B. At the same place on the same day, the Defendant printed out the application form for survivors’ benefits following the death of E in the name of the said H in the “written request for survivors’ benefits” of the computerized system of the Public Official Pension Service (integrated strategic management system).

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a “written claim for retirement allowances for bereaved family benefits” in the name of H, a private document concerning rights and duties without authority.

(c)

On August 28, 2015, the Defendant printed out the form of “written decision on the payment of bereaved family lump sum to bereaved family members” in the “written decision on the payment of bereaved family benefits to the public official pension management system (integrated strategic management system)” in the “written decision on the payment of bereaved family benefits following the death of E, and signed the name of J, the team leader, at his own discretion, in the column of the examiner.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a “written decision on the lump-sum payment of bereaved family members” under the name of J, a private document concerning rights and duties.

(d)

At the same place on the same day, the Defendant may keep the “written claim for the retirement allowance of bereaved family members” under the name of H and the “written decision for the payment of bereaved family benefits to bereaved family members” in the name of J in the F Team office as if they were actually prepared.

arrow