The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s imprisonment (one year and six months of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects against the defendant.

However, considering the fact that the amount of penphone handled by the defendant is not large, that the defendant was sentenced to a punishment for the same kind of crime, that the medication of narcotics was committed again within two months after being released from the sentence, that there is a great need for punishment as a serious crime detrimental to the social and national soundness due to its toxicity, and that all the sentencing conditions of the defendant including age, character, character, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime do not seem to be too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.