beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The facts following the facts do not conflict between the parties, or may be acknowledged by taking account of the whole purport of the pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 4, Gap evidence 8, Eul evidence 1 and Eul evidence 16 (including the serial numbers).
1) The Plaintiff is a trade company B (hereinafter “B”) with the purpose of trade business, etc.
2) The defendant is a representative director of the defendant's association, and the defendant is a corporation with the purpose of credit business. The non-party C is a person in charge of general affairs such as claims management and risk management at the defendant association E branch located in the defendant association located in the Dong-gu Office of Cleanju from March 30, 2006 to March 31, 201.
B. F’s loan application 1) F’s loan application from G on July 22, 2009 to the Defendant: (a) F’s amusement facilities with 6th floor of H-framed reinforced concrete structure (refinite) concrete roof (refinite), Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si; and (b) “instant building”
In order to purchase the instant building, the Defendant Union applied for a loan of KRW 2 billion (a loan of KRW 1.3 billion as collateral, KRW 4-6 billion, KRW 700 million as collateral) to the Defendant Union on the security of the instant building (a loan of KRW 1.3 billion as collateral). (b) The Defendant Union rejected an application for a loan of KRW 2.1 billion on October 31, 2007, KRW 2.1 billion of the maximum debt amount set up as of October 31, 2007 on the instant building, KRW 1.26 billion of the maximum debt amount set up as of November 1, 2007, KRW 1.26 billion of the right to collateral security and the right to collateral security set up as of November 1, 2007
C. 1) The instant building is the ownership of G and was converted from the general building to the collective building around October 23, 2007. 2) On August 18, 2009, the Plaintiff leased KRW 1.25 billion to F as the purchase fund of the instant building, and the Plaintiff agreed to recover KRW 1.42 million including the loan principal and interest thereon within 2 months. As to the entire building of G ( de facto F ownership).