A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 31, 2016, at the court of Daejeon District Court No. 232 located in Seo-gu, Daejeon District Court No. 15:30 on March 31, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the above-mentioned case to the effect that Defendant C in the above-mentioned District Court case No. 2015 Go-Ma4217, “No. D had been present at the beginning of November, but D did not have been present at the beginning of November,” and then, the Defendant was selected as a witness of the above-mentioned case.

It is necessary to examine whether "D's scam from the house to the larger scam with a large path." It is necessary to examine the cases such as scams and scams.

“To reply,” and continue to be, “Irreth 3th day of November”, whichever is to be followed by the Attorney-at-law in detail.

“In response, the testimony was made to the effect that D was able to walk in a state where D was not boomed or boomed around November 3, 2014, in favor of C.

However, on November 1, 2014, D was hospitalized in E hospital in Sejong, which was located in Sejong, and was in the semi-annual string of bridge part. On November 7, 2014, D was going out from the above hospital for the first time around November 7, 2014. At the time of the going out, D used a pair of Aluminum ray (cmor, cmorine) and a shoese for a degreer (cmorum) in the semi-annual string state.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Recording notes of the examination of a witness in relation to D;

1. Application of the judgment of injury to Daejeon District Court 2015 High Court Order 1283 High Court Order, Daejeon District Court Order 2015 High Court Order 4217 High Court Order 2015 High Court Order 4217 High Court Order

1. Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for a crime under relevant Article 152 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Perjury of the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is an offense that causes confusion and incompetence in the judicial action of the State by obstructing the trial to find the truth of the court and requires a corresponding punishment due to poor quality of the offense.

However, the defendant.