logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.02.08 2015가합40497
철판수거등
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) Company A and the Defendant B jointly share with the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) KRW 19,118,260, and this is accordingly.

Reasons

The principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed to have been filed.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) On August 6, 2010, the mutual savings bank located in Busan District Co., Ltd. (1) On the commencement of the auction procedure on the instant real estate, the bank located in Busan District Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) shall be deemed as having established a factory and mining foundation mortgage Act with respect to the building stipulated in No. 36457 and No. 28914 of the table of the land and the above ground building owned by C and machinery, equipment, etc. installed on the said land and building (hereinafter

(2) After completing the registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage on the building, C was removed from the building No. 36457 of the above building, and C was established with two reinforced concrete columns and one pipe pole on the land, and newly constructed real estate listed in the attached Table No. 2 (hereinafter “instant Capital”). On December 24, 2013, on the above Capital, C completed registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage on the land as Busan District Court Private Registry No. 5163 on December 24, 2013.

3) The Plaintiff’s voluntary auction procedure based on the above collateral security (Dasan District Court H; hereinafter “instant auction procedure”) of the mutual savings bank Busan District District District Court

) From August 7, 2014 to each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

The land indicated in the list 1, 3, 4, and 5 is “the site of the gas station of this case”, and the building listed in paragraph 2 is “the gas station of this case”, and the capital of this case is Nonparty 1-1 of the list.

(B) Upon receipt of a decision to permit sale as to the instant real estate, the sales price was paid in full on September 1, 2014. (B) The Plaintiff received an order to deliver the instant real estate (U.S. District Court I) and conducted delivery execution as to the instant real estate on November 4, 2014 on the sole basis of the debtor’s performance, and the Defendant B, the representative director of the Defendant A Co., Ltd (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”), was the sales body, warehouse, and the main one (hereinafter “the instant goods”).

arrow