Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the owner of the office of Gosung-gun D Officetel in order to manage the above D Officetel by entering into a lease contract for the room room, and the defendant B is the owner of the above D Officetel.

1. On November 3, 2009, Defendant A entered into a lease agreement with the victim E with respect to subparagraph 202 of the said Dtel as the lessor, and received KRW 20 million. On January 2017, Defendant A failed to return the lease deposit to the victim. The victim filed a lawsuit claiming the return of the lease deposit against Defendant B on January 26, 2017.

4. 27. The winning of the case, and the same year.

5. 15. A decision was made to commence compulsory auction of the above Officetel building.

On May 1, 2017, the Defendants, in order to evade compulsory execution from the above office of the office of the above office of the Dtel, and there is no relationship between the Defendants with a loan claim between the Defendants. Defendant A, inasmuch as there is no relationship with a loan claim between the Defendants, Defendant A, “A, debtor B, the loan amount of KRW 300 million, the payment date of KRW 15,00,000, October 15, 2009, the principal change date of which was December 31, 2015, and the interest rate of KRW 15%,” and Defendant B, on December 1, 2015, affixed a letter of loan claim to the debtor’s name.

On June 1, 2017, the Defendants continued to submit to the Changwon District Court an application for provisional seizure of real estate Nos. 203 of Dtel 203 on the basis of the above loan certificate to the Changwon District Court:

7. Upon receipt of a provisional attachment decision, around August 24, 2017, the Changwon District Court submitted an application for demand for distribution with a claim amounting to KRW 300 million for the claim under the auction procedure (CYF) against the Dtel building.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit a false debt in order to escape compulsory execution, thereby damaging the obligee as a creditor.

2. Defendant A is at the office of the above office of officetel around February 25, 2017.