logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2016.03.07 2015고정687
근로기준법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant of "2015 High 687" is a C representative director of a corporation whose head office is macro-si B, who runs real estate development, sale, and construction business, and has performed the construction of D-si Housing and new construction of E-owned Housing by using five full-time workers.

Defendant 1 worked as the US head of the construction site from January 7, 2013 to July 8, 2013, the sum of KRW 3,300,000,000 in the wages of the FF retired on March 8, 2013; KRW 3,300,000 in the wages of April and June; and KRW 745,160 in the wages of July, 2013, the Defendant did not pay KRW 10,50,000 from the date of retirement within 14 days from the date of retirement without any agreement on the extension of the payment period between the parties.

The defendant of "2015 High 688" is a trust holder under the name of the real owner of G land and one to five real owners of electric power units on the land at Gyeongnam-si, Gyeongnam-si, and H is a trustee under the name of the trustee.

On August 2013, the Defendant and H offered to receive a small amount of security deposit of the auction real estate by submitting a false lease contract even though the lease contract was not related to the above real estate.

On August 2013, the Defendant prepared a false real estate lease agreement with the head of the Defendant’s house located in Sinnam-si, Gyeongnam-si, with the lessee as to one unit of G-won Housing. On September 30, 2013, the Defendant voluntarily withdrawn the said claim for distribution from the Changwon District Court’s common branch around May 14, 2014, by submitting an application for a report on the right to preferentially distribute a small amount of deposit equivalent to KRW 14 million under the Housing Lease Protection Act, to the Changwon District Court’s common branch located in the Dong-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Seoul-si, the Defendant filed an application for a demand for distribution along with the above false real estate lease agreement, with the knowledge that there is no amount to be distributed to the victim Changwon Construction Co., Ltd. (the creditor of provisional seizure).

Accordingly, the Defendant conspireds with H.

arrow