logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.03.25 2014나5364
제3자이의
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence Nos. 1 and 3, the Defendant is recognized to seize the instant movable property based on the original copy of the payment order issued by the Seoul Eastern District Court 201j202 against the Plaintiff who is the Plaintiff, with the executory power of the payment order issued by the Seoul Eastdong District Court 201j202, Ulsan Jung-gu C apartment 601 on February 19, 201

B. The Plaintiff asserted that the instant movable property is owned by the Plaintiff’s own, owned by the Plaintiff’s mother, and owned by the Defendant’s penalty. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the instant movable property is owned by the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit since compulsory execution against the Plaintiff’s mother or the goods owned by the Plaintiff’s penalty cannot be asserted.

2. As such, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow