1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. With respect to cases where this Court applies for a stay of compulsory execution 2014Kag175, March 3, 2014

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. In full view of the purport of evidence Nos. 1 and 3 as a whole, the Defendant’s seizure of the instant movable property located in Ulsan-gu C Apartment on February 19, 2014 upon the decision of the payment order issued by the Seoul Eastern District Court No. 201 tea 202 against the Plaintiff who is the Plaintiff.

B. The Plaintiff asserted that since the above apartment owner of the above apartment where the movable property of this case is located falls under the ownership of the Plaintiff, the Defendant’s compulsory execution against the movable property of this case should not be denied. Thus, it is difficult to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s assertion only by the statement of evidence No. 2, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, we cannot accept the plaintiff's above assertion.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.