logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.09.12 2014고단4421
위조유가증권행사
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for up to eight months.

However, it is against the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 201, Defendant A, at the place in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, stated that “this is an external bond issued by the Bank of Korea and exchange exchange to 50%,” which is a forged securities, the Defendant issued 200 copies of the two separate copies of the two separate copies of the two separate copies, including “Korea Bank of Korea”, “Korea’s Financial Bond,” “Korea Bank of Korea’s Financial Bond,” “Bank of Korea’s KRW 50 million,” “50 million,” and “50 million,” to the left-hand top of the two separate copies and exercised this.

2. Defendant B (one person G)

A. On October 201, the Defendant knew that the instant claim was forged due to the relationship that was returned by holding 11 of Chapter 11 among the Republic of Korea’s financial public bonds that the Defendant acquired with the knowledge of the Defendant’s knowledge, but it was not possible to identify the authenticity of the claim. However, around August 10, 2012, the Defendant issued KRW 100 of the Korea’s financial public bonds, which are valuable securities, to C, with the fact that “A is able to identify the place where the claim is dealt with,” and exercised this by providing 100 copies of the Korea’s financial public bonds.

B. Although the Defendant was returned again on the ground that the Korea Financial Bonds issued to C cannot be commercialized, on September 14, 2012, the Defendant issued 100 copies of the Korea Financial Bonds issued to C, a total of 100 copies of the Korea Financial Bonds issued to C, which are valuable securities, upon receiving a request to change again, and exercised it.

3. Defendant C was aware that the above claim was forged on the ground that the Defendant received one copy of Korea’s financial bonds issued by the Defendant C, but was returned to D, but it was impossible to be commercialized, but he was re-issued in Jongno-gu Seoul on September 2012.

arrow