(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2015.10.08 2015고정211

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2015.10.08 2015고정211

업무방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 201, the Defendant used the “D” garage for a limited partnership company in Jinju-si, the Defendant used the victim E (the victim E (the 49-year-old) who is working partner due to trade union activities, and assaulted the victim’s chest by cutting down the victim’s boom with his/her hand while he/she was in dispute with the victim’s boom.

2. On May 201, the Defendant: (a) committed several assaults on the part of the victim, following the debate with the said victim as a result of call taxi service as an issue of the said “D” labor union office; (b) on the ground that the victim went out of the office, and (c) committed several assaults.

3. On July 14, 2014, the Defendant used the above “D” garage on the ground that the said victim was unable to perform his/her duties as the chairperson of the Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Committee, and used the victim’s chest to have his/her chest sealed.

4. On July 2014, 2014, the Defendant: (a) sought to be on the front line of the said “D” garage; (b) sought to be on the part of the said victim and the welfare expenses; (c) refused to operate the taxi on the ground that the victim was required to operate the taxi; (d) obstructed the victim’s taxi business by abusing the key from the taxi of the victim; (c) obstructed the victim’s taxi business by force for about 20 minutes; and (d) assaulted the victim’s flap and flaps by sping flaping the flap, which gets back the key of the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by the prosecution (including the substitute and E part of the statement);

1. Each prosecutor's statement concerning F and E;

1. Each police statement of the E, G, H, I, and G;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel requested the victim to discuss the welfare cost issue at the time and place specified in Paragraph 4 of the judgment of the defendant, and brought about the key to the rejected victim's vehicle to 20 minutes. However, the victim did not want to operate the taxi at the time, and therefore there was no interference with the business.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.11.24 2017고단2255

-서울행정법원 2018.04.05 2017구합1407

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2012.06.01 2012고정76

-인천지방법원 2016.12.01 2016고정3077

-춘천지방법원 2019.11.12 2019고단718