logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.08.09 2017고단2156
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On September 10, 2016, the Defendant loaned money to the victim to pay the credit card price in advance to the victim at AR stations in the operation of the Victim Q Q in the Nam-si, Nam-si, Namyang-si (AP) within one week.

“.....”

However, the Defendant did not have any specific income at the time and did not have any property, and around that time, the Defendant did not lend money from others for the purpose of paying off the money, such as the purchase-price and investment deposit, so even if he borrowed money from the damaged party, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the money.

In such a situation, Defendant 1 received the total of KRW 1050,000,000 from the victim’s false statement and KRW 1050,000,000 in the agricultural bank account (AS) under the name of the Defendant on September 12, 2016, KRW 200,000 on September 17, 2016, KRW 400,000 on November 11, 2016, KRW 200,000 on November 15, 2016, KRW 10,000 on November 15, 2016, KRW 100,000 on November 19, 2016, KRW 80,000 on November 21, 2016, KRW 400,000 on November 23, 2016, KRW 508,50,005.

2. On October 2016, the Defendant had a method of 3.7 million won to look at the victim’s clock 10 million won in the instant AR gas station at the early 2016 Police Officer.

I would like to purchase and offer money at the right time.

“.....”

그러나 사실 피고인은 피해 자로부터 돈을 받더라도 피해자에게 롤렉스시계를 구입해 줄 의사나 능력이 없었다.

Even so, Defendant 1, as above, made a false statement to the victim and received 3.7 million won in cash from the victim’s seat.

3. On November 21, 2016, the Defendant shall pay a fine to the public prosecutor’s office immediately to the victim at the gas station in the above AR.

A loan of KRW 2.6 million shall be repaid until November 25, 2016.

“...”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the damages even if he borrowed the money from the damaged person for the reasons of Paragraph 1.

Even so, Defendant 1 makes a false statement to the victim as above.

arrow