In the case of the crimes set forth in Nos. 1 and 2 of the judgment of the defendant, the crime set forth in Nos. 1 and 2 of the annexed crimes list shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in the period of eight months for fraud in the Daegu District Court Branch of the Republic of Korea on March 27, 2013, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for fraud

4. 4. The above judgment was finalized.

[Criminal facts]

1. From July 19, 201, the Defendant was working for B labor union members from around July 19, 201.

On August 8, 2012, the Defendant stated to the effect that “The Defendant changed the victim’s residence located in the Northern-si C, North Korea-si, and the victim’s “B union 40 million won to find employment of the children.”

However, at the time, it was not a reason to employ new union members because B was in the lawsuit related to the permission for the establishment of a labor union. At the time, the defendant did not have monthly income and did not think that he was able to use it as living expenses, etc. by receiving money from the injured party, and there was no intention or ability to find the injured children as employment in B.

However, Defendant 1 was transferred to the Daegu Bank’s account in the name of the Defendant, as seen above, KRW 10 million on October 22, 2012, and KRW 30 million on March 18, 2013, under the pretext of job placement service for those who belong to such false statement.

2. On January 20, 2012, the Defendant is expected to make a repayment immediately upon lending money to the victim at the victim D’s residence located in Northern-gu, North Korean-si, Dong-gu, Seoul on January 20, 2012.

“.” The purport was “.

However, the facts are that the defendant was a member at the time.

B Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment did not have any particular reason to receive monthly payment due to the absence of any property that had no other reason to receive, and therefore, there was no intention or ability to complete payment even if it borrowed money from the injured party.

However, Defendant 1, as seen above, received 5 million won from the injured party to the account of Daegu Bank in the name of the Defendant at the same time as the borrowed money, and the sum of 7,700,000 won from that time to January 9, 2014, as shown in the list of crimes attached hereto, are the same.