The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment (a fine of KRW 7 million and an additional collection of KRW 1,692,500) imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Although the defendant's mistake is recognized to have been divided in depth, support the mother of 86 years old, and the house provided as a security is being seized due to delinquency in paying interest on loans, etc. There is no record of punishment for the same crime as the crime in this case, nor there is a circumstance where the defendant given up premium of 50 million won after the commission of the crime in this case and discontinued his business on May 31, 2015. However, since the crime of arranging sexual traffic in this case committed by the defendant is highly harmful to the society, the crime of arranging sexual traffic in this case committed by the defendant is highly likely to harm the good customs by commercializing women's sex, it is highly necessary to strictly punish the defendant in order to block the period of sexual traffic, the scale of the business operated by the defendant in this case, the size of the business place operated by the defendant in this case, and other circumstances such as the defendant's motive and circumstances leading to the crime in this case, the circumstances of the defendant's occupation and behavior, the circumstances of the defendant's age before and after the crime in this case, etc.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.