logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.04.23 2014노1717
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

A. A. fine of KRW 8 million, Defendant B. fine of KRW 5 million, Defendant C, D, E.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that each sentence (a fine of KRW 10 million is imposed on the Defendants, and a fine of KRW 7 million is imposed on Defendant B, Defendant C, D, E, and F: each fine of KRW 5 million is imposed on the Defendants) imposed by the lower court on the Defendants.

2. Determination

A. Defendant A not only has the record of being punished by a fine due to the same crime, but also has the criminal history of being punished by a suspended sentence of imprisonment, a fine, and the criminal act of this case committed by the Defendant has been committed several times. The criminal act of this case is highly harmful to the society by commercializing women's sex, and thus, it is necessary to strictly punish the criminal act in order to block intermediary and commercial sex, but the criminal defendant is in profoundly against his wrong recognition, and the same criminal power of this case was committed 14 years prior to now. According to the facts of this case, according to the facts of this case, the period of arranging commercial sex acts by the defendant for business purpose is short, the period of arranging commercial sex acts by the defendant is too short, and it appears that it would not exceed its operating profit, and other various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records, such as the motive and circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the circumstances before and after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior, occupation, and family relationship, etc., the

B. Although Defendant B committed the instant crime, since it is highly harmful to the good morals by commercializing women’s sex, it is necessary to severely punish the instant crime in order to block intermediary traffic suppliers and intermediary traffic suppliers. However, although the Defendant is aware of the fact that it was erroneous for the Defendant to have committed the instant crime, there is no criminal record, and according to the facts charged in the instant case, the period during which the Defendant engaged in arranging sexual traffic for business purposes is short, and it seems that the Defendant would not have much operating income.

arrow