logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.10.12 2016노3393
명예훼손
Text

The judgment below

Among them, defamations are each made around December 27, 2012, around January 11, 2013, around May 19, 2013, around May 2013, around May 20, 2013, and around January 22, 2014.

Reasons

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case. However, the court below found the defendant guilty on the ground that the defendant's alleged facts are true and for the public interest, and thus, the illegality under Article 310 of the Criminal Act is dismissed. The court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion

2. Ex officio determination (damage to a deceased person);

A. The summary of this part of the facts charged is that at the meeting of the E clan in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H (hereinafter “instant clan”) around December 27, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the meeting of the E clan in Dobong-gu (hereinafter “instant clan”); (b) on the grounds that G 20 members were unqualified as a member of the clan; (c) G is not the son; (d) G is the president. The president: (e) the father of G sells maek kel kne and kel kne kn; and (d) G was a member of the E clan in the instant clan; (d) G was not a member of the E clan in the instant clan; and (e) G was not a member of the E clan in the same day; and (e) the father of G was not a member of G in the instant clan; and (e) the father of G was not a member of G, who was not a member of the EM from among 50 members of the instant clan in the same day.

However, the victim network I of G was the first child of F listed as F in the family register I and the family register compensationJ, and there was no fact that he sold paper and sold it to any foreign country, and G did not receive money on the condition that he did not participate in the opposite to the opposite to the Fm wave conference.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by openly pointing out false facts, damaged the reputation of the deceased deceased, I.

B. This part of the facts charged is a crime falling under Article 308 of the Criminal Code.

arrow