logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2020.06.25 2018고단1686
특수협박
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The excessive one (No. 1) seized shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018고단1686] 피고인은 2018. 7. 16. 07:30경 부산 북구 구포만세길 82 (구포동) 구포역 택시 승강장 앞에서, 피고인이 아무 이유 없이 구포역에서 나오는 기차 승객에게 욕설하는 것을 택시 기사인 피해자 B(62세)이 만류한다는 이유로, 피해자에게 "개새끼 눈을 파버린다."라고 위협하며 호주머니에서 위험한 물건인 과도(총길이 19.5cm 칼날길이 9.5cm )를 꺼내 마치 피해자의 얼굴 부위를 찌를 것처럼 들이댔다.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

[2019 Highest 1373] On May 26, 2019, the Defendant, around 12:40 on May 26, 2019, displayed the victim the transition (19cc in total length, 9cc in knife length) of dangerous articles held by the Defendant as the victim C (the age of 48) changed tobacco.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 1686]

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. A report on investigation (for example, attachment of video images and search results) (hereinafter referred to as the “crimeCCTV”);

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Excessive use by the suspected person;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (to analyze and attach CCTV images around the site);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. For the reason of sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, the crime of this case is not likely to be committed by threatening the victims by carrying dangerous articles.

The victim was not able to receive any conviction from the victim.

The defendant has been prosecuted after having been prosecuted for the 2018 Highest 1686 case, but he/she was prosecuted.

arrow