1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the building (hereinafter “instant building”) and the Plaintiff is a liquefied petroleum gas supplier who supplied liquefied petroleum gas to the F cafeteria located on the first floor of the instant building in the name of “E”.

B. On March 11, 2017, gas explosion and fire therefrom (hereinafter “instant accident”) occurred in G offices located on the first floor of the instant building at around 23:14, and most of the instant buildings were destroyed by fire.

C. As a result of the joint identification, the instant accident was opened for the reason that the main valves of liquefied petroleum gas facilities installed in the instant building were unknown, and the gas pipeline terminal part connected to the G office was left alone without taking any measures to prevent it, and it was investigated that gas was accumulated in the said office and that it was explosiond by a point of view that gas was not known.

Liquefied petroleum gas facilities installed in the building of this case are the structure that connects four gas containers to each gas pipe through a single gas pipe.

E and liquefied petroleum gas supply contract was connected to the rest of the commercial buildings in the instant building, but the place where gas was supplied and used actually shall be an F cafeteria.

The two gas pipes, excluding the gas pipes in the direction of the F cafeteria and G office, among four gas pipes, were subject to measures to prevent the terminal part of the horse, and the rough structure is as follows:

H H H H F F

E. On July 28, 2017, the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office rendered a decision not to prosecute Defendant C and E employees I’s employees I, on the ground of lack of evidence regarding explosive objects and the suspicion of injury by occupational negligence, and on the ground of lack of evidence. However, a summary indictment was filed only for the suspicion of violation of the Safety Control and Business of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Act (hereinafter “Diquefied Petroleum Gas Act”).

(Seoul Southern District Prosecutors' Office 2017 punishment No. 40944). Accordingly, Seoul Southern District Court is the defendant on August 17, 2017.