logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.07.06 2017고단668
건설산업기본법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 8 months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant C’s fine of 3 million won, and Defendant D’s fine of 3 million won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Judgment of the court below] The Defendants concluded that construction works related to construction or substantial repair of a building exceeding a certain size under the Framework Act on the Construction Industry should be executed by a comprehensive construction business owner. In order for some construction owners who intend to reduce construction costs to formally take charge of construction works by employing their own seal and purchasing materials, and formally take charge of construction works, they agreed to take over a construction company with a comprehensive construction license and lend only a comprehensive construction license to the said owner without performing the construction work, and the agent at the construction site will loan the national qualification certificate and career certificate from those who have acquired a construction certificate, such as a construction engineer, to make a false registration.

Defendant

A, on May 23, 2016, after completing the registration of K's business entity, which aims at the construction business, the business entity J and 105 of Pyeongtaek-si in Gyeonggi-do as its place of business and its head office, and Defendant B leased the company's formal office at the above address.

Defendant

On June 3, 2016, A acquired L Co., Ltd. with a comprehensive construction license located in Busan Metropolitan City at KRW 180 million, and registered the trade name of L Co., Ltd.’s L Co., Ltd. at Kro, the location of its head office, and the change of company director A at the place of business located in Pyeongtaek-gu, and registered the change to K on June 9, 2016.

Defendant

B, Defendant A, and Defendant C returned to the construction site of the entire country, and leased a comprehensive construction license to construction participants and distributed the name of the company. Defendant D used a license to lend it at the above K’s confidential office located in the sports-related city of the Gyeonggi-gu M. 1402.

arrow