logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.27 2014가합544383
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant: 187,91,757 won to Plaintiff A Co., Ltd.; 88,46,709 won to Plaintiff B; and Plaintiff C.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The instant construction contract was concluded, etc. 1) Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (former trade name was “D Co., Ltd.”), but the trade name was changed as of October 28, 2014.

(C) The term “stock company” in the Plaintiffs’ indication is omitted.

(2) On June 7, 2007, the Plaintiffs concluded a contract for construction works with the Defendant (hereinafter “the instant construction works”) (hereinafter “the instant construction works”), which is a joint supply and demand organization (hereinafter “the instant construction works”), with the Defendant, a local government, on June 7, 2007, as a joint supply and demand organization (hereinafter “the instant construction contract”). The said investment ratio is KRW A51, Plaintiff B24, and Plaintiff C25%.

3) The instant construction contract is a construction work executed in the amount of KRW 21,931,14,000 for a total of 1,460 days from June 13, 2007 to June 12, 201, and is subject to the general conditions (hereinafter “instant general conditions”).

The main contents of the attached Form shall be as follows.

1. The general conditions of the instant construction contract are stated.

4) Meanwhile, the instant construction contract is deemed to apply the contents of the standard agreement on joint supply and demand as of the date of concluding the contract with the Plaintiffs’ joint supply and demand relationship as is, and Article 8 of the Standard Agreement on Joint Supply and Demand provides that “The price shall be paid to each of the representatives of joint supply and demand contractors and the members of the joint supply and demand organization.” (B) The instant construction contract changes several times, and the instant construction contract changes on August 26, 2013; and (3) the final amendment was made on September 6, 2013 by September 26, 2013.

2. The details of the amendment to the instant construction contract are as indicated;

(hereinafter referred to as “each number of tea contracts” specified as “the next number of tea contracts,” and the individual modified contract is specified as “the next modified contract by the next number of teas” (hereinafter referred to as “the next modified contract”). 2 Plaintiffs on September 6, 2013.

arrow