logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.20 2015가합547365
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,446,902,98 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from August 11, 2015 to September 20, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Co., Ltd.” in the name of the Company B is entirely omitted.

On December 28, 2011, the term “C Facility Corporation” (hereinafter “instant Corporation”) between the National Defense Facility Headquarters, the Defendant’s affiliated organization, and the headquarters of the National Defense Facility.

As to the total construction cost (hereinafter “instant construction contract”) 46,897,422,20 won, total construction period, and construction contract from December 28, 201 to February 28, 2014 (hereinafter “instant construction contract”).

(B) The Plaintiff was a merged company (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”). The Plaintiff is a merged company (hereinafter referred to as “the Plaintiff”).

(2) The main contents of the general conditions of the construction contract incorporated into the instant construction contract (hereinafter “instant general conditions”) are attached thereto.

1. As stated in the general conditions of this case, the relevant statutes, which were enforced at the time of entering into the construction contract of this case, are attached hereto.

2. The entry into the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

B. The instant construction contract was modified and the instant construction contract was completed on July 25, 2015, with the total construction amount of KRW 46,897,422,220 as a long-term continuing construction contract, and the total construction period from December 28, 201 to February 28, 2014. However, the contract was concluded on several occasions, and the contract was finally concluded on several occasions, and the total construction amount of KRW 54,890,674,640, and the final completion date was changed to July 25, 2015, and the total construction period was extended to 512 days. The specific details of the change were as follows.

3. The details of the amendment to the instant construction contract are as indicated.

(D) On July 25, 2015, the Plaintiff completed the instant construction work and delivered the facilities completed to the Defendant. The Plaintiff, on July 23, 2012, ordered Nonparty D to perform part of the instant construction work on a subcontract to Nonparty D, and on May 30, 2012, to Nonparty E respectively, respectively. (The Plaintiff’s indirect construction cost claim 1) The Plaintiff extended the construction period of this case on August 5, 2014 to the side of the U.S. military.

arrow