logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.04.08 2019고정2170
폭행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 12, 2019, the Defendant, around 06:10 on July 12, 2019, brought in due to the act of assault in the crime of the Gwanak Police Station in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and the office on duty, and took the bath, asked the seat of the atmosphere in that place, remove the waiting room, and remove the waiting wall from the waiting room on several occasions, thereby damaging the goods used by the public office so that the repair cost can be caused.

On October 2, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 01:25, 201: (b) around October 2, 2018, the Defendant 2019 Highly 2624: (c) around 01:25, the Defendant, while drunkd the victim on the ground that the victim was wrong in calculating the drinking value in the D’ D’, and thereby interfered with the victim’s business by force. (d) At the same time, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (a) the Defendant dumpeded the victim; (b) the victim, who had drinking in the above main point, and (b) the Defendant dumpeded the victim, “dump”; and (b)

around 03:50 on June 9, 2019, the Defendant alleged that the victim F in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City B and the first floor abused animals by reporting the new animals being raised at the above location within the main point of “D,” and obstructed the victim’s business by force by avoiding disturbance between about 40 minutes, such as intending to take a bath to the victim and the niter employees, etc.

Summary of Evidence

"2019 Highly 2170"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Reporting on investigation (using police gear of a suspect and committing additional crimes), and reporting on investigation (suspect behavior) (2019, 2624);

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and E;

1. C and E’s written statements, the Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that there is no disturbing fact, such as that the Defendant did not say that the Defendant was an article with C, and that the Defendant was “a mental hospital”, and that there is no disturbing fact, such as taking the Defendant’s intent to “cradate” to E.

However, according to the consistent statements made by the witness C and E, it is called ‘C' as criminal facts in the judgment of the defendant and ‘C'.

arrow