1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 11, 1995, the Plaintiff succeeded to the Plaintiff’s property, following the death of Pyeongtaek-si I (hereinafter “instant I”) and 109 square meters prior to J (hereinafter “instant J land”) and the instant D, E, F, G, and H land owned by the Plaintiff.

B. Accordingly, with respect to the instant I, D, E, F, G and H land, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of the Songwon District Court’s Songwon District Court’s receipt on July 15, 1998 as the receipt on July 15, 1998, and with respect to the instant J land, the receipt on March 21, 2005 as the receipt on March 21, 2005 as each of “Inheritance on May 11, 1995.”

C. Meanwhile, with respect to the instant land D, E, and F, the Suwon District Court: (a) received on May 28, 2003 on the ground of “the donation on May 26, 2003; (b) the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the Defendant B; and (c) the registration of ownership transfer for the instant G and H land under the name of the same registry office as the receipt No. 18469 of May 28, 2003 on the ground that “the donation on May 26, 2003” was based on each of the above Defendant C’s respective registrations of ownership transfer under the name of the same registry office; and (d) the registration of ownership transfer for each of the above Defendant B (hereinafter referred to as “the respective registration of ownership transfer

(D) K and Defendant C were put in place. D. K and Defendant C were simplified, and K and Defendant B were two-dimensionals, and upon the death of K, the Plaintiff resided in the apartment of Defendant B’s mother M. [based grounds for recognition]. There is no dispute, Gap’s evidence 1, 2, and Eul’s evidence 2 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply).

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

2. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Plaintiff completed the registration of each transfer of ownership of the instant Lri in the name of the Defendants, based on the Plaintiff’s personal seal impression, seal impression, and identification card, which the Plaintiff received from the Plaintiff, for the purpose of destroying and newly constructing the instant G-owned land farming house (hereinafter “instant farming house”) that Defendant B resided together with M around April 2003, based on the Plaintiff’s personal seal impression, seal impression, and identification card, and thus, the registration of each transfer of ownership of the instant Lri should be cancelled after the cause