logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.04.17 2018가합555749
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relationship 1) The Plaintiff is a corporation established pursuant to Article 26 of the Information and Communications Industry Promotion Act, which is a quasi-government agency under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Science and ICT that provides support for research and policy-making of information and communications technology industry, support for the development and development of information and communications industry, support facilities, support facilities, etc.) and support for the establishment and growth of information and communications enterprises. The Defendant A served as the responsible research institute affiliated with the Plaintiff from August 2009, and Defendant B served as the senior research institute from July 201 to July 201, and Defendant A served as the senior research institute from the same team with Defendant A (hereinafter “E”). The Defendant C, a representative director of the Radio Internet Information Service Company E (hereinafter “E”).

B. F’s task 1) In relation to “G business,” which was planned by the Plaintiff and provided with government contributions from the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, H (hereinafter “H”).

) The F task is referred to as “F” (hereinafter “instant project task”).

A) Around November 1, 2012, to December 31, 2013, Defendant B, who was selected as the supervising agency, carried out the instant project task. (2) At around October 2012, Defendant B, who consented to the purport that “I would like to help the instant project task to be selected as the Plaintiff’s support project, and to divide the amount of the project cost on the main project plan so that the project cost can be reflected in the Plaintiff’s support project.”

Defendant A received 660,220,000 won from the Plaintiff’s bank account in the name of K, and then received 660,220,000 won from the I, Co., Ltd., Ltd., which performed the service of the above business from H, after he received an excessive appropriation of the H’s project cost around that time.

Defendant B’s order from K representative L Co., Ltd. to the name account managed by Defendant B from the representative L, whichever is above 660,220,00 won, among the above 660,220,00 won, Defendant B’s order.

arrow