1. The plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendant C shall be dismissed.

2. Defendant E Co., Ltd. shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 276,370,00 and this shall apply.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship 1) The Plaintiff is a corporation established pursuant to Article 26 of the Information and Communications Industry Promotion Act, which is a quasi-government agency under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Science and ICT that provides support for research and policy-making of the information and communications industry, support for the development and development of information and communications industry, support facilities, support facilities, etc.) and support for the establishment and growth of information and communications enterprises. The Defendant A served as the responsible research institute affiliated with the Plaintiff from August 2009, and Defendant B served as the senior research institute from July 201 to January 201, and the Defendant C served as the head research institute at the same team as the Defendant A (hereinafter “I”) from around January 201 to the IT convergence promotion department.

3) Defendant E (former trade name: J. hereinafter “E”)

(4) Defendant G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) is a company engaged in the production and software development and supply business, and Defendant F took overall charge of the overall business of the company as an internal director of the above company. Defendant D was a company engaged in the production and software development business. Defendant F, as the representative director of the above company, was responsible for the overall business of the company.

B. K’s task 1) In relation to “L business,” which is conducted by the Plaintiff’s planning and receiving government contributions from the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, the corporation M (hereinafter “M”) and I “K” task (hereinafter “K”).

A) The Defendant A was selected as a joint management institution and performed the instant project from December 1, 201 to December 31, 2012. (2) On February 2012, 2012, when M and I were selected as an institution to perform the instant project and received government contributions from Defendant D in the future, Defendant A was under the name of N. managed by Defendant A, after receiving an amount higher than the amount to be received from E in the course of performing part of the instant project, inasmuch as M and I was selected as an institution to perform the instant project.