The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

1. In full view of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor to the gist of the grounds for appeal, even though the defendant could sufficiently recognize that the defendant violated the matters to be observed by food service business operators by installing stage and reflective sound facilities in the restaurant in this case, and running entertainment bar business, the court below found the defendant not guilty of the facts charged otherwise, which erred in the misapprehension of facts as the incomplete hearing

2. Determination

(a) No general restaurant business operator of the facts charged shall be equipped with sound and reflective facilities and allow customers to sing;

On April 9, 2014, around 23:10, the Defendant violated the code of practice of food service business operators, such as having “D” general restaurants, automatic reflectrs, microphones, etc., which are operated by the Defendant on the first floor of Goyang-dong, Yongsan-gu, U.S. C, and having two customers under his/her name read and dance in line with the orders of the aforementioned devices.

B. The lower court determined as follows: ① Report on detection of the case against the violation of the Food Sanitation Act: (a) stated the following circumstances: (i) “Singing the finger and F to have their dance in the club”; (b) “One male finger and one female finger had been sing and dancing at the time of their appearance; and (c) on the next side, H stated that “Sing the finger and a man, a man, a man, a man, was playing a music and singing,” and (b) in the lower court court court’s trial, the witness stated that “Sing had not been singing, a man, and a woman, a man, a man, and a woman. There was no fact from the Defendant at the time of the enforcement of the Food Sanitation Act.” There was no content that “Sing part was discovered at the time,” and that there was no content that the Defendant allowed the customer to sing.