1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 20, 2016, the Plaintiff was found to have been on the first floor of the site, around 10:30 on February 15, 2016, when he was working for the day-to-day worker of B from around January 20, 2016 at the scene of the construction of a private house, the signal system corporation in the Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and had been working for the painting at the site of the construction of a private house, and had no horses thereafter, and had been transferred to the hospital by the 119 first-aid vehicle, and had the result of the transfer of the goods to the hospital by the 119 first-aid vehicle (hereinafter “the instant injury”). The Plaintiff was diagnosed and applied for medical care benefits to the Defendant.

B. On July 1, 2016, the Defendant issued a disposition not to approve the Plaintiff’s application for medical care benefits (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that “The Plaintiff did not clearly verify what reason has been used, and does not prove whether the Plaintiff was an acute addiction of an organic solvent, and it is difficult to recognize a proximate causal relation with the work of the superior branch because the cause of the injury was not discovered, and in the case of an external thropical thropical thropical thropical thropical thropical thropical thropical thropical thropical thropical thropical thropical

C. The Plaintiff, who was dissatisfied with the instant disposition, filed a request for review to the Defendant, but dismissed.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 1, 4, and 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the legitimacy of the disposition

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff did not wear protective equipment such as air conditioners on the day of the accident, and carried out the work in an environment where all windows are not opened by open air booms. On the first floor, the plaintiff was addicted to poisonous gas, which was used in the Escopic copic scopic scopher on the floor of the first floor, or emitted from new construction materials, and the present donation occurred temporarily.