1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From February 1, 2013, the Plaintiff, as an employee of the Home PSEL, was in charge of the preparation and sales of goods, such as salted fish, at home flus B, and applied for medical care benefits of this case to the Defendant as an applicant for the injury or disease by asserting that the instant injury or disease was diagnosed by the Home flusium hospital (hereinafter “the instant injury or disease”). On September 13, 2013, at around 15:00, the instant flusium performed one-hour-hour work in the air conditioners, along with the flusium worker, in order to adjust products, and even thereafter, the two copies were continuously treated, and the two copies were continuously treated, and the flusium hospital applied for medical care benefits of this case.

B. On November 14, 2013, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition that rejected the Plaintiff’s application for medical care benefits on the ground that “it is difficult to recognize a proximate causal relation with the instant shopping branch’s work” on the ground that “it is difficult to confirm the short-term and long-term task, but may partially be borne due to the business of arranging the cooling room performed on September 13, 2013, but it is not determined due to changes in business environment to the extent that brain-related diseases may occur.”

C. On February 28, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a petition for review to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee. However, on February 28, 2014, the Plaintiff was ruled to dismiss the petition for review.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap Nos. 1, 2, 3, and Eul No. 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion did not have been treated or treated as a cerebrovascular disease before the instant case, and the Plaintiff continued to work in a cooling room around ten (10) days before receiving a diagnosis for cerebrovascular and continued to work after two (2) and caused aggravation of symptoms and caused the instant injury.

Therefore, the plaintiff's non-approval of the injury and disease of this case is illegal.

(b) Entry in the attached Form of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

C. Facts of recognition 1) The Plaintiff’s labor relations and work status are as follows.