beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The instant public land is the public land owned by Chuncheon City, and the Plaintiff entered into a public property loan agreement (Evidence A No. 1) with the Chuncheon City on March 2, 2007, stating the property subject to the instant public property loan agreement as “604 square meters prior to Chuncheon City C.” However, there is no dispute over the fact that the Plaintiff’s ground water installed by the Defendant is on the land leased by the Plaintiff, and thus, the Plaintiff should indicate that the land leased by the Plaintiff is the public land of this case. The purport of the lease agreement was to lease the public property.
B. On January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018, the Chuncheon City concluded a loan agreement on public property, the lease period of which expires as the Plaintiff’s above loan agreement expires.
C. The Defendant, among the co-owned land of this case, has a vinyl of the part “A” in the column of the attached sheet No. 8, 9, 10, 11, and 8, which connects each point of the sub-paragraph of the attached sheet No. 12, 13, 14, 15, and 12 in sequence, and the part “B,” which connects each point of the sub-paragraph of the attached sheet No. 16, 17, 18, 16, and 16 in sequence, and the co-owned house of the attached sheet No. 19, 20, 21, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, and 29 in order of each of the sub-sections of the co-owned land of this case, and each of the co-owned land of this case is owned by the co-owned land of this case, 31, 334, 334, and 29 in sequence.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the records and images of evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the result of this court's request for surveying and appraisal to the Director of the Korea Land and Information Corporation
2. The assertion and judgment
A. (1) The Plaintiff’s assertion (1) concluded a public property loan agreement with respect to the public land of this case and leased and used it, and the Defendant installed the vinyl, dog, and pents stated in the purport of the claim on the ground of the public land of this case.