logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.06.24 2014나22879
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff and Defendant B are dismissed.

2. The plaintiff and the defendant B were involved.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: “from May 6, 2010 to May 30, 2010, the period from May 6, 2010 to May 6, 2010,” which means “from May 6, 2010 to May 30, 2013 of the first instance judgment.

6. As up to 30.30., the part 5.21 of the first instance judgment (2012 high-ranking 1484) is the summary order (2013 high-ranking 723). The part 6.4-5 of the second 6. K and the said Defendants appealed, and the above case is currently pending in the appellate court.

“K and the said Defendants appealed, but all appeals were dismissed, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 9, 2015.

“Along with the fact that there is no evidence to prove the above alleged facts, the statement of No. 11-24 of No. 13 and No. 11-2 of No. 13 as to “No. 21” of No. 7 as “No. 21, 23,” and the statement of No. 11-12 of No. 13 as to “No. 8-1 through No. 24 are sufficient to acknowledge the above alleged facts, and there is no other evidence to prove it,” respectively. Each statement or image of No. 22-1, 2, and 3 of No. 17 as to “No. 12-1, 2, and 4 of No. 13 as to “No. 13, No. 18” were added to “No. 11-8 of No. 18 of the Civil Procedure Act,” and each statement or image of No. 21-4 of the judgment is insufficient to admit the defendant’s assertion or image as evidence.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals filed by the Plaintiff and Defendant B are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow