Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates "C" in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B, 21 Dong 186, and is engaged in the purchase of computer parts.

A person engaged in the business of selling used parts of a computer has a duty of care to verify whether the goods intended to be sold are stolen by ascertaining the personal information of the seller and entering the details of the acquisition of the computer parts, the reason for the sale, and the price at which the transaction price is suitable for the transaction price.

On June 13, 2015, at around 10:30 on June 13, 2015, the Defendant acquired stolen stolen goods by purchasing 301,000 won CPU, etc., which he stolen from E through employees D, by neglecting the above duty of care at the above location and neglecting the determination on stolen goods. From June 15, 2012 to June 13, 2015, the Defendant acquired stolen stolen goods by purchasing 3 to 4 times a month from June 15, 2012 through F, G, etc. (purchase of stolen goods worth approximately 30-500,000 won at the time of purchasing once).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's office and police interrogation protocol of E, F, and G;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to details of transactions, investigation reports (attached to the purchase price table of “C computer parts”);

1. Relevant Articles 364 and 362 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts. Article 362 (Selection of Fine)

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. A fine of KRW 3 million imposed on the sentenced sentence (a penal penalty of KRW 5 million: ① the first offender, ② the confession, ② the confession, ③ the circumstances to be considered in the course of committing the crime, ④ the further fact that it is likely not to mislead such a mistake in the future; ⑤ other factors, Defendant’s age, occupation, and economic aspects, etc. are considered as favorable factors for sentencing: Provided, That this shall be considered as favorable factors for sentencing: (6) the records that the Defendant was subject to a disposition of the suspension of indictment twice due to the same criminal conduct, and (7) the period of the purchase of stolen goods and its size as unfavorable factors

1. Article 70(1) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.