logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.02.19 2016가단520009
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 12,696,881 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and against this, from June 12, 2015 to February 19, 2020.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is the managing body of Suwon-si A apartment in Suwon-si, and the defendant is the occupant of the above apartment.

B. On June 11, 2015: (a) around 23, 2015, the Defendant boarded an elevator up at the 1st floor sports center of the above apartment complex; (b) the Defendant boarded several labing rooms; (c) the Defendant boarded several labing rooms; and (d) the elevator door outside of the elevator is shut down without entering the elevator.

The defendant found the above cart side and attempted to see the reduction of it into the elevator, and the defendant's side head was strongly shocked to the elevator door due to the operation of the elevator between the above cart, and the above cart was left rapidly in the future (if it seems to be a sudden reduction to the outside). Accordingly, the defendant's side head was strongly shocked between the above cart and the elevator door, and the defendant's side head was strongly shocked to the elevator door.

(hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case"). C.

The Defendant suffered from injury, such as brain-dead, salvinal salvinum, and pressure salvinal salvinum, due to the instant accident.

[Evidence: Evidence No. 1, Evidence No. 2, 3 (including paper numbers), All purports of oral argument]

2. As the principal lawsuit, the Plaintiff asserts that the damages liability that the Plaintiff should compensate for to the Defendant due to the instant accident does not exceed 300,000 won, and sought confirmation thereof.

However, as seen later, the Plaintiff’s damage liability against the Defendant is a total of KRW 12,696,881 and its delay damages, and thus, the Plaintiff’s claim on the principal lawsuit is without merit.

3. Judgment on the counterclaim

A. According to the above recognition of the occurrence of the liability for damages, the accident of this case is operated in a state that increased in the carart on board the elevator gate, and due to that reason, the carart will in front.

arrow