logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.09.06 2018고단536
교통사고처리특례법위반(치사)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant in the instant charges is a person engaged in driving a vehicle BK5, and the “On April 26, 2016,” which is the date of the accident written in the indictment on April 26, 2017, stated in the indictment, is an error.

11:33 At Jeju, the driver's duty of care was to drive the front road of C in order to avoid the shock with the Defendant's vehicle and to prevent the accident by driving the said vehicle from entering the front road of C in the direction of the main road, along with the access road of the front line from D bank to the front and rear side of the main road. However, on May 3, 2017, the injured party caused the death of the victim E (the 46-year-old truck) with the driver's duty of care to prevent the accident from occurring on the front and rear side of the main road.

2. Determination:

가. 피고 인의 변소 피고인은 이 사건 사고 다음 날인 2017. 4. 27. 경찰에서 조사를 받을 때부터 일관되게 “ 좌측 방향지시 등을 켠 채 지선에서 본선 2 차로로 진입하려고 하다가, 피해 트럭이 1 차로로 차로를 변경하는 것을 보고 본선 2 차로로 진입하였다.

“The assertion is made”.

(b) The following shall be arranged in order of time, such as a statement of traffic accident analysis by the National Institute of Scientific Investigation, and the results of analysis of CCTV taken by the National Institute of Scientific Investigation into account the facts of the National Institute of Scientific Investigation, and the results of analysis of CCTV taken by the National Institute of Scientific Investigation into consideration:

① The length of a white zone installed in the section up to the point of the instant accident is about 85 meters.

A safety zone at the beginning of about 1 minute of CCTV video play time.

arrow