The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal stated that the traffic accident in the facts charged of this case (hereinafter “accident in this case”) occurred because the victim E, a car driven by the Defendant, consistently in the investigative agency and the court of the court below, brought about the occurrence of a traffic accident by shocking the string vehicle driven by the victim E, and the Defendant stopped on three-lanes following the occurrence of the accident in this case, and examined the front part of the accident after the Defendant stopped the string vehicle on the three-lanes, and kept up the opposite lane in the situation of the accident at the site of this case. In full view of the content of the traffic accident analysis letter that the vehicle driven by the Defendant and the vehicle driven by the Defendant coincides with each other in the front part of the right side of the vehicle driven by the victim, the judgment of the court below acquitted the Defendant of each of the facts charged of this case, but it is erroneous in the misapprehension of judgment.

2. In full view of the circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the lower court is insufficient to recognize that the evidence alone, which was submitted by the prosecutor, caused the instant accident by shocking the victim’s motor vehicle driven by the Defendant.

In light of the above facts charged, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable in comparison with the above evidence, and there is no violation of law as alleged by the prosecutor.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.