A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On May 4, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) at the District Court on May 4, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 12th of the same month, but the suspended sentence was revoked on October 6, 2016.

1. Around 12:25 on August 19, 2016, the Defendant reported to the police that “the victim victim D (one, the name of the victim, and the 15 years old) living together from around 12:25, and that “the victim suffers from violence from the suspect, and sexual intercourse with the video,” by phone call in 112, and reported to the police that “the victim is suffering from damage caused by the sexual intercourse with the video.” As such, the Defendant reported the victim’s face to “the date of selling and doing the same.” On the ground that he reported to the police that “the victim is suffering from the sexual intercourse with the video,” the victim was 5 times the face of the victim by drinking is 5, the victim’s body was boomed by hand, and the victim’s body was taken several times by drinking and drinking.”

As a result, the defendant committed violence to the victim for the purpose of retaliation against the provision of investigation teams in relation to the investigation of his criminal case.

2. At around 12:30 on August 19, 2016, the Defendant damaged public objects, during the process of arresting a flagrant offender against a police officer dispatched to the scene for the same reason as the indicated in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant’s inspection on the Defendant’s possession was made by voluntarily submitting gallon 3 Handphones to the police officer and seized them as evidence.

On August 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a Handphone from a police officer F officer F to remove a handphone; (b) received a handphone from a handphone, and damaged the handphone on the floor. On August 19, 2016, the Defendant laid the handphone on the floor and damaged the handphone.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the above Handphone, which is an object used by public offices, and harmed its utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement (as to the facts set forth in subparagraph 1 on the market, partial statement);

1. The witness D’s legal statement 1.