The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is not a narcotics handler.

1. On September 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) delivered approximately 0.18 grams of Mesofta (one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”) a part of E’s FE -, parked near D hotel located in Daejeon Seo-gu Daejeon, to the above E, and received philopon by delivering approximately 0.18g of Melopon, a local mental medicine, to the said E.

2. On February 9, 2015, the Defendant provided the said E with approximately 0.18 gramphones, which was parked near H in Dong-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, for free, and received phiphones.

3. On June 10, 2015, the Defendant delivered approximately 0.3g of phiphonephones to the above E in the above E-vehicle parking lot located in the J Hospital funeral hall in Daejeon-gu I, Daejeon, and received and delivered phiphones.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the prosecutor’s judgment and the evidence upon the Defendant’s application, namely, E was issued from K on June 25, 2015 by the police.

After the statement, on June 26, 2015, the police reversed the statement and received the instant philophone from the Defendant.

The statement of E was made in the custody of a person suspected of violating the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc.

“The statement to the effect that” was stated, 3. E was given free of charge because the Defendant borrowed money from the Defendant and gave interest on the reason that the Defendant delivered phiphones without compensation.

“Although the statement was made to the effect that the details of monetary transactions are not verified at all, E did not make a consistent statement on the crime related to one’s penphone, including the instant case, and L.