1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is ordered.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case after filing a petition as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

2. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance, which was dried, shall be written with the “(b) part (A) of 98 square meters in a ship connected each point of the attached Table 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1, which is linked in sequence to each point of the attached Table 20, 21, 22, 23, and 20 square meters” in the second 9-10 attached Form of the judgment of the court of first instance, shall be written with the “number of 98 square meters in a ship (B) connected each point of

Article 11-12 of the text of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as the "Annex 2 List") shall be construed as the "building indicated in the attached Table 1 List 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, and 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 223, 24, and 1.

The written evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, and 8 (including various numbers) of the first instance judgment Nos. 5-6 of the first instance judgment, "The purpose of the whole pleadings" was "A," each of the written evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, and 8 of the first instance judgment, and each of the written evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, and 8 of the first instance judgment, and the overall purport of the pleadings."

Part 4 of the judgment of the first instance court "the result of the entrustment of market price appraisal with respect to appraiser G of this court" shall be applied to "the result of the entrustment of market price appraisal with respect to appraiser G of the first instance court".

The 4th sentence of the first instance judgment, the 19th to 5th sentence, shall be followed as follows.

3) Article 643 of the Civil Act regarding the lessee’s right to demand purchase is a mandatory provision under Article 643 of the Civil Act regarding the lessee’s right to demand purchase. Thus, an agreement violating this provision has no effect against the lessee or lessee, but is disadvantageous to the lessee or lessee. However, whether the agreement is an unfavorable agreement to the lessee, etc. should be based on the relevant contract itself, but it is substantial considering the details of the conclusion of the agreement