logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.05.21 2019나200790
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as "No. 15, 2014") written "No. 15, 2014") shall be written "No. 15, 2014."

The third to fifth to fifth of the judgment of the court of first instance, “However, each of the contracts of this case became impossible to achieve either the contract of this case,” shall be deleted.

The following shall be added to the third part of the judgment of the first instance and the third part of the 12th part.

“The Defendant shall be deemed to have embezzled public funds, the use of which in the community property is clear.”

(1) The first instance judgment of the court of first instance, i.e., whether “a person has taken advantage of” in the fifth instance judgment, and i.e., whether “a person has taken advantage of” or embezzled public funds, and ii) the fifth instance judgment “a person has taken advantage of or embezzled public funds.”

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow