Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. From around 20:30 on September 20, 2016 to 22:00 on the same day, the Defendants: (a) held the victim E (n, 52 years old; (b) at the “F restaurant; and (c) held Defendant A’s right to alcohol to the victim; (b) held Defendant A’s right to alcohol on the ground that the injured party did not drink but drink other customers; and (c) hump the bed with the bed of the bed and the bed of the bed of the bed and the bed of the bed and the bed of the bed of the bed and the bed of the bed of the bed; and (d) made other customers unable to use the restaurant.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. The defendant A of special intimidation refers to the time and place mentioned in paragraph 1 to avoid disturbance.

The reason was that the shoulderer's disease, which is a dangerous object in the restaurant, was knifeed by hand, and the victim G ( South, 44 years old) who is a guest, was threatened.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. The instant photograph related to the case [the Defendants denied the purport that they did not commit any act as stated in the facts charged, but all of the Defendants’ respective acts stated in the facts charged were proven based on each evidence indicated in the summary of the

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant legal provisions and choice of punishment on the crime;

A. Defendant A: Articles 314(1) and 30 (Interference with Business) of the Criminal Act; Articles 284 and 283(1) (Special Intimidation) of the Criminal Act; and selection of fines, respectively.

B. Defendant B: Articles 314(1) and 30(Interference with Business) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines

1. A aggravated defendant for concurrent crimes: The former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows: (a) background of the instant crime; (b) method and degree of business interference; (c) method and degree of special intimidation; and (d) the Defendants’ criminal records.