logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.04.10 2014고단399
수질및수생태계보전에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as an internal director of the “E” corporation for the purpose of manufacturing automobile parts located in D in Silung-si, is a person operating the said corporation.

1. No person who intends to install a wastewater discharge facility that emits specific substances harmful to water quality shall do business using a wastewater discharge facility without obtaining permission from the competent authority;

Nevertheless, from May 29, 2013 to November 7, 2011 of the same year, the Defendant did not obtain permission from the competent authority, and installed the CNC Line 11 and a smoke 1, which is the sum of solvents 0.850 cubic meters, which is a discharge facility that generates cu, a specific substance harmful to water quality, and operated the Defendant using it.

2. No one shall leak, leak, or throw away a specific substance harmful to water quality into public waters without justifiable grounds;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around 19:10 on November 6, 2013, completed the operation at the place of business of the said corporation, and completed the cleaning of the place of business, ordered the work workers to convert about 600-liters of wastewater containing three specific substances harmful to water quality, including 4.145g/liter (Permissible Discharge Standard: 3mg/liter) into the excellent Manle located in the place of business, thereby creating a white liter belt over a flow distance of 1,152.1m in flow-distance.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an act of discharging specific substances harmful to water quality in public waters without justifiable reasons.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused;

1. Each written confirmation of violation and explanatory note of the defendant;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning the F;

1. A statement of public official and a statement of the suspect;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each relevant photograph (the No. 5 and 9 of the evidence list), the response (the evidence list No. 18), the results of inspecting pollution levels of wastewater (the evidence list No. 22);

1. Matters concerning the preservation of the relevant Article of criminal facts and the selected water quality and aquatic ecosystems;

arrow