1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition, modification, or correction as follows. Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be added, modified or corrected;

A. Grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance

B. 1) The Defendant asserts to the effect that, as the lessee B has the right to request renewal of the lease agreement for a period of five years under the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act, it cannot be deemed that the lease period has expired since it was demanded renewal prior to the expiration of the lease contract.

However, according to Article 2 of the former Commercial Building Lease Protection Act (amended by Act No. 12042, Aug. 13, 2013) and Article 2 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 22283, Jul. 21, 2010; Presidential Decree No. 25036, Dec. 30, 2013), the right to request the renewal of the contract under the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act was the case of Seoul Special Metropolitan City (including the amount converted by May 11, 2012, the date of entering into the lease contract with the Plaintiff and B), which was the date of entering into the lease contract; and Article 2 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Commercial Building Lease Lease Protection Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 25036, Dec. 30, 2013).

Therefore, the defendant's argument is without merit.

B. Grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance

(b)2.The last reduction of paragraph 2 shall be added to the following:

The defendant shall be at the trial, and at the trial.