logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2020.12.09 2019가단11209
건물철거 등
Text

Defendant C is of the amount of 610 square meters in Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, the Plaintiff:

(a)each point of Annex 19, 20, 25, 18, and 19, indicated in Annex 19, 20, 25, and 19.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 13, 1996, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the land of 610 square meters in the Dong-gu, Nam-gu, Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. Defendant C, among the instant land owned by the Plaintiff, installs and owns 5 square meters of a warehouse on the ground of the part on the part on the ground of (c) part of the attached Form No. 19, 20, 25, 18, and 19 attached Form No. 19, among the instant land owned by the Plaintiff, which connected each point on the ground of (d) part of the attached Form No. 21, 22, 23, 24, 24, and 21, 23, 24, and 21, and the attached Form No. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 19, respectively, and owns 71 square meters of the land on the part on the ground of (a) part on

C. Defendant D owns, as its outer wall, 12 square meters of the part on the ship (v) part (v) part (v) connected with each of the items in the attached sheet No. 15, 26, 27, 13, 14, and 15, among the instant land owned by the Plaintiff, as its outer wall of the building. Defendant D occupies the part (b) of the attached sheet No. 47 square meters connected in sequence to each of the items in the attached sheet No. 16, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16.

[Reasons for Recognition: entry in the evidence of subparagraphs A through 7, the result of a request for surveying and appraisal to the Korea Land Information Corporation by this Court, the purport of whole pleadings]

2. According to the fact of recognition as above, Defendant C is obligated to remove each of 2 m2,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow