1. The defendant shall receive on February 9, 1996 from the plaintiff the Suwon District Court with respect to the area of 711 square meters prior to Leecheon-si.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 9, 1996, the Defendant completed the registration of preservation of ownership (hereinafter “registration of preservation of ownership”) with respect to B, Echeon-gun, Leecheon-gun (hereinafter “instant real estate”), 711 square meters prior to the change of the name of the administrative district: B, 711 square meters prior to Leecheon-si; hereinafter “instant real estate”).

B. (i) On December 20, 1978, the Gyeonggi-gun E Forest No. 23207 square meters owned by C (C, Chungcheong-gun D) was divided into four lots, namely, 2278 square meters of F forest land and four lots, respectively.

On December 20, 1978, F forest land 2278 square meters in Echeon-gun, Leecheon-gun was converted into G forest land 2856 square meters, and G forest land 2856 square meters was divided into one parcel outside G forest 2754 square meters on December 20, 1978, and G forest 2754 square meters was replaced with 701 square meters prior to H on July 10, 1997 and 1217 square meters prior to I.

C. (1) Following C’s death in around 1927, J (J, Chungcheongbuk-gunK), the heir of Australia, succeeded to the property of J (J, Chungcheongbuk-gun), and as the J died in around 1959, the property of J succeeded to L (L, Chungcheongbuk-gunK) who is the heir of Australia. After that, on October 24, 1995, the Cheongju District Court rendered a judgment of disappearance against L (the expiration date of the period of disappearance: September 28, 195; hereinafter “instant judgment of disappearance”) and thereafter, the adjudication of disappearance was finalized.

Shem M has died of around 1975 as L's wife, and the plaintiff (theme) NO is L's child.

[Grounds for recognition] The facts without dispute; Gap evidence Nos. 1, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, and 15; the fact-finding results on the female branch of the Korea Rural Community Corporation in this court; the fact-finding results on the female branch of the Korea Rural Community Corporation in this court; the fact-finding results on Sep. 27, 2014 of this court on Sep. 29, 2014; the purport of the whole pleadings;

2. Where a replotting disposition is taken based on a land improvement project under the former Agricultural Community Modernization Promotion Act which has been abolished, the ownership of a substitute lot to be granted under a replotting plan shall be acquired by the previous land owner, and a project implementer misleads the owners and makes a substitute lot to other persons than owners.

Even if other persons acquire ownership, it should not be said that they acquire ownership.