1. The Defendant’s annual interest in KRW 15,744,726 against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and its related thereto from November 19, 2013 to September 28, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. On April 1, 1912, the Land Survey Division drafted during the Japanese Occupation Period: (a) stated that G with the address of 2,721 square meters (hereinafter “instant land before the instant partition”) in E-gun, E-gun, Leecheon-gun, 1912 was under the circumstance of G having the address in E-gun, Leecheon-gun.

B. 1) The land prior to the instant division was 2,582 square meters in the Hacheon-gun, the land category of which was changed (e.g., May 10, 196), and 2,582 square meters in the Hacheon-gun, Leecheon-gun, and J river 496 square meters. The 2,582 square meters in the Hacheon-gun H river was changed to the administrative district name on March 1, 1996, “2,582 square meters in the Hacheon-si, Leecheon-gun, Lee 496 square meters in the 496 square meters in the name of the administrative district on March 1, 1996.” The 5,917 square meters in the Hacheon-gun, Leecheon-gun, J-gun, Gun-gun, were divided, the 397 square meters in the 5,917 square meters in the name of the administrative district ( March 1, 1996), and the 3829 square meters in this case.

C. After the death of October 13, 193, the Plaintiff, Appointers B, C, and D (hereinafter “Plaintiffs, etc.”) died on February 1, 1941, N, the South-North of M solely inherited L’s property.

N and their spouseO and child P were missing in the 625 War and they were declared missing on October 16, 2014, each of which was declared missing on October 16, 2014, and confirmed on November 6, 2014, and Q, N’s children, was solely inherited the N’s property.

On July 21, 2002, Q Q died and the plaintiff et al., his children jointly inherited Q Q's property.

[Reasons for Recognition] A’s without dispute, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 2-1 through 4, Gap’s evidence Nos. 3-1 through 4, Gap’s evidence Nos. 4-1 through 4, and Gap’s evidence Nos. 5, and the fact-finding results against the Director of the National Archives of this Court on October 21, 2014; the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. G, the assessment title of the land before the instant partition, and L, the Plaintiff, etc. are the same person. Of the land before the instant partition, the attached Form is among the land before the instant partition.

1. Drawings 6 through 31, 41, 42, and 6 respectively;