beta
Text
1. The defendant falls under the "official amount" stated in the annexed sheet of "written claim and cited amount" to the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) From October 1950 to March 1951, when the war of the Republic of Korea occurred, the residents living in the above area due to the 11st group 20 solidarity of the armed forces and the 9th group of the Korean army, who had been living in the above area under the 11th group 20 group and the 11th group of the Korean army, who had been living in the above area under the 11th group 9 group. 2) On March 16, 2009, the 11st group of the 11st group of the previous History Resolution Committee for the Truth Reconciliation of the Truth (hereinafter “the 11st group of previous History Resolution Committee”) confirmed the 11th group of the "Yannam area of the Republic of Korea War as the Mayang, B, C, D, E, G, G, H, H, K, the victims, and LA as the truth-finding findings.
B. From October 1950 to May 1951, when the Korean War was in progress, 1950, 80 residents of the Korean War were killed or went missing after being killed or went on the spot as soon as possible in the process of unexploiting the suspect in the military, or immediately after taking the police station’s hand back, during the process of checking the suspect in the military. 2) On March 16, 2009, the past History Settlement Commission confirmed the civilian sacrifice case by the police police in the Ma, N, P, Q, Q, Q, R, U, V, W, W, Z, Z, Z, AE, AE, AE, AE, AE, AE, AE, AE, AH, AH, AH, AE, APE, AE, APE, AE, APE, APE, AE, APE, APE, AM, APE, APE, APE, AM, APE, APE, APE, AM, APE, APE, AM, APE, AM, AM, AM, AM, A.
C. Family relations between the deceased and the plaintiffs are as stated in the family status of the victim and the bereaved family.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 59, 71, 72 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination
A. In the investigation report by the past History Settlement Commission, the overall flow of the subject case and the present situation and the overall contents of the case are highly reliable.
However, it is civil against the state.