logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원목포지원 2015.06.11 2014가합12640
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' respective claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 2, 1950, during the Korean War, military police officers in the area south of the Korean War had taken care of water uniforms operations in each region after the Seoul Suwon, which was in force, and had been punished by the anti-presidential operations until March 3, 1951. Many civilians were killed during the process of discovering suspects who had been in concert with the People’s Forces.

B. Decision 1 of the Committee on the Settlement of History for Truth and Reconciliation 1) The Framework Act on the Settlement of History for Truth and Reconciliation (hereinafter “The Act on Settlement of History”)

(1) The Traculty Reconciliation Commission established under this section (hereinafter referred to as the “Regulatory Commission”) shall be

A) From 18 persons, J, etc. received an application for ascertaining the truth regarding the case of the civilian sacrifice in the area of the Yan-gu, and started an investigation. The applicant investigation, witness investigation, and data investigation were conducted. 2) During the investigation process of the witness investigation conducted by the Committee for the Settlement of the History in the past, K (the first sixth degree of she was identified as a victim by the truth-finding decision) has been well written. As such, after having been recovered from the fact that L was responsible for the general affairs of the People’s Office for occupation and occupation of the People’s Republic of Korea, the police was able to keep the body back to the sea. After examining L’s total body in the “Sacheon-gu,” the police and L’s father stated that the body was recovered from the sea. The Mado-gu and L’s father did not request the issuance of a copy of the deceased’s complaint to this end, but the Mado-gu Committee did not request the issuance of a non-legal copy of the deceased’s complaint.

3) On the basis of the bereaved family’s statement, reference witness’s statement, etc., the Committee confirmed 21 persons, including the deceased L/C on May 18, 2010 as victims related to the sacrificingan area’s civilian sacrifice case, and confirmed the truth-finding decision of this case (hereinafter “the instant

AB made it.

(c).

arrow