Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for not less than five months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving C.

On July 29, 2013, the Defendant driven the above bus on July 13:00, and proceeded with the road of the 1-lane in order to stop the bus in order to let passengers get out of the bus stop at the bus stop. The Defendant stopped the bus in order to let passengers get out of the bus stop at the bus stop.

A person engaged in driving service of motor vehicles has a duty of care to prevent accidents by taking necessary measures, such as opening the door accurately in order to prevent the person on board or getting on or off the motor vehicle from falling off.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and did not discover the victim D who was under way in the rear of the bus, and caused the victim to fall from the bus due to the negligence of business, which started without opening the rear door.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a 12-day breast-culse therapy, which requires approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Reports on traffic accidents and reports on occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Inquiry into the enemy;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to cutting down each black stuff, video image, and photographor;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) and Article 3 (1) 10 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act

1. The crime of this case with the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is a case where the defendant started while driving urban buses without safely and thereby the victim was injured. However, in light of the degree of injury to the victim, the crime of this case, including the fact that the defendant's recognition of the crime and reflects the fact that the defendant was smoothly agreed with the victim, the defendant's vehicle is covered by mutual aid insurance.