logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.09.26 2019고단3787
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaging in driving village buses B.

On June 7, 2019, the defendant driven the above bus around 12:30 on June 7, 2019, and was stopped in order to let passengers get off at the bus stops in front of the D middle school located in the area C in Suwon-si.

In this case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent passengers from falling off the bus by safely starting the door after checking passengers' getting on and off the bus.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the victim E (the age of 69) (the age of 69) to go far away from the road when the door starts in the open state.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as 12 weeks of treatment, such as her chest frighting and closing, of the body in which it was necessary.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident-related statement of E;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Investigation report ( Results of checking bus booms images);

1. Photographss of bus booms and video materials;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) and Article 3 (1) 10 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant of reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to a provisional payment order shall take necessary measures, such as opening the door accurately and closing so as not to fall from the persons boarding or leaving a bus while driving as a bus engineer.

However, although the defendant was not in a state where the victim left a bus stopping at a stopping place and left the road yet safely, it is due to the shutdown of the entrance rapidly without properly examining it, and the bus start.

arrow