beta
Text
The defendant is innocent.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, as a staff member of C hospital, sent off the face of the victim from a cell phone from the victim who was suffering from Si guard to Si guard on July 25, 2016, on the ground that he was receiving a call for hospitalized treatment from the victim D (53 tax) and was getting on the part of the victim and getting on the part of the above hospital owned by the above hospital, at around 125, the Defendant got off the victim's face and got off the cell phone from the victim with Si guard on the ground that he was getting on the part of the victim, and thereby, caused the victim's loss to the part of the above ambulances, and caused the victim's injury, such as an open wound, which requires medical treatment for about 14 days, to the victim.
2. According to each legal statement of the defendant and witness D, D, knowing that the defendant was driving on the ambulances by telephone, etc., brought a dispute between the defendant and the defendant, such as threatening the defendant by telephone, etc., and said D, the chief of the ambulances of the ambulances, the defendant, and the defendant said D, the end of the vehicle, and the defect that D, whose engine part was cut from the ambulances to the end, opened an even driver's seat door toward the defendant, and attempted to see the defendant, when the defendant shuts even the driver's seat door, the suspension of D's hands down to the door and body, and D's door is very sound, and D's door is opened.
In order to avoid this, the defendant is able to recognize the fact that the face, etc. of D has been paid several times due to his body on the front side while he was able to avoid this.
First of all, with respect to the part where the defendant's seat shuts even after driving, thereby causing injury to D's fingers, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone has the intention to inflict an injury on the defendant.
It is insufficient to recognize it.
Next, with respect to the defendant's injury to the driver's seat after shut down even the driver's seat, and with respect to the whole act of the driver's injury to D due to the launch, the defendant is himself from the illegal attack of D.